Ⅰ 제 출 문 Ⅰ 메타버스 컨소시엄 참여대학 총장님 귀하 (가톨릭상지대학교, 강동대학교, 강릉영동대학교, 강원도립대학교, 거제대학교, 경기과학기술대학교, 경남 도립거창대학, 경남도립남해대학, 경민대학교, 계원예술대학교, 구미대학교, 군장대학교, 기독간호대학교, 대구보건대학교, 대원대학교, 대전과학기술대학교, 대전보건대학교, 동강대학교, 동남보건대학교, 동서울 대학교, 동아보건대학교, 동양미래대학교, 동원과학기술대학교, 동의과학대학교, 마산대학교, 명지전문대학, 목포과학대학교, 문경대학교, 배화여자대학교, 백석문화대학교, 부산여자대학교, 부천대학교, 삼육보건대 학교, 서울여자간호대학교, 서일대학교, 서정대학교, 선린대학교, 세경대학교, 수원여자대학교, 순천제일 대학교, 신성대학교, 아주자동차대학, 여주대학교, 연성대학교, 연암공과대학교, 연암대학교, 오산대학교, 용인예술과학대학교, 우송정보대학, 울산과학대학교, 원광보건대학교, 유한대학교, 인천재능대학교, 전남 과학대학교, 전주비전대학교, 제주관광대학교, 조선간호대학교, 조선이공대학교, 창원문성대학교, 춘해보건 대학교, 충북도립대학교, 충북보건과학대학교, 충청대학교, 한국승강기대학교, 한양여자대학교 이상
65개교) 본 보고서를 “메타버스 컨소시엄 참여대학의 계열별 실감(XR) 콘텐츠 개발 요구조사” 연구용역 (2022년 5월 20일 ~ 2022년 7월 30일)의 최종 보고서로 제출합니다. 2022. 7. 30. 연구기관명 : (사)한국고등직업교육학회 책임연구원 : 주 현 재(삼육보건대학교) 공동연구원 : 윤 태 복(서일대학교) 정 은 실(삼육보건대학교) 최 성 경(한국외국어대학교) 한 송 이(동국대학교) - i - Ⅰ연구 계획서 요약Ⅰ 공동 개발 방안 연구 요약 전문대학 메타버스 컨소시엄 구성 대학 간 계열별 실감형 강의 콘텐 츠 공동 개발을 통한 DX 기반 고등직업 교육 혁신 - 메타버스의 가상세계(Virtual World)기술과 증강현실(Augmented Reality)기술을 활용하여 실제와 유사한 학습경험을 제공할 수 있음 - 전문대학에서 중요한 현장중심 교육과정 및 실습 교육이 위축되고 있 는 상황을 실감형 콘텐츠 기술의 도입으로 해결 연구 목표 63개의 메타버스 컨소시엄 참여대학의 공동 참여로 실감형 강의 콘텐츠 개발 효과성 증대 및 제작비용 감소 보건, 공학, 교육 계열별로 실감형 콘텐츠 활용하여 현재의 현장중심 교육의 한계를
개선함으로써 실습 교육의 질 강화 추진 전략 계열별 실감형 콘텐츠 제작 및 적용으로 미래 교육 혁신 사례 개발 - 메타버스 컨소시엄 참여대학에 공통으로 개설되어있는 학과를 중심으로 실감형 콘텐츠를 제작하기 위한 강의주제 선정 - 실감형 콘텐츠를 적용한 혁신적인 수업 운영 사례 개발 및 우수 사례를 전문대학 전체와 공유 세부 연구 요약 - 문헌 연구와 설문조사 및 FGI를 시행의 결과 분석을 중심으로 진행함 - 연구 방법 - FGI 시행을 통해 간호 3개, 치위생 2개, 뷰티 2개, 유아교육 2개, 자동차 2개, 전자 2개, 건축 3개가 선정되었음 기대성과 1. 전문대학의 실감형 콘텐츠를 효과적으로 설계하기 위한 가이드 역할 2. 계열별 실감형 콘텐츠 주제 및 내용 선정으로 개발의 효율성을 증진 3. 디지털 테크놀로지 기반의 실감형 콘텐츠 개발 사례 확산에 기여 - iii - 연구 계약서 요약 ···················································································· ⅰ Ⅰ. 서론
·····································································································1 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 ······································································································· 3 2. 연구 방법 ······························································································································ 6 Ⅱ. 선행문헌 고찰 ···················································································11 1. 간호 분야 ···························································································································· 13 2.
치위생 분야 ························································································································ 20 3. 건축 분야 ···························································································································· 23 4. 자동차 분야 ························································································································ 30 5. 전자 분야 ···························································································································· 35 6. 유아교육 분야
···················································································································· 40 7. 뷰티 분야 ···························································································································· 47 Ⅲ. FGI 연구 결과 ··················································································55 1. 간호 분야 ···························································································································· 57 2. 치위생 분야
························································································································ 60 3. 건축 분야 ···························································································································· 62 4. 자동차 분야 ························································································································ 65 5. 전자 분야 ···························································································································· 67 6. 유아교육 분야
···················································································································· 70 7. 뷰티 분야 ···························································································································· 72 Ⅳ. 결론 ·································································································75 1. 논의 ····································································································································· 77 2. 활용방안
······························································································································ 80 메타버스 컨소시엄 참여대학의 계열별 실감(XR) 콘텐츠 개발 요구조사 차 례 - iv - [참 고 문 헌] ···························································································82 [부 록] 1. 간호 FGI 회의록 ··············································································································· 87 2. 치위생 FGI 회의록 ··········································································································· 90 3. 건축 FGI 회의록
··············································································································· 93 4. 자동차 FGI 회의록 ··········································································································· 96 5. 전자 FGI 회의록 ··············································································································· 98 6. 유아교육 FGI 회의록 ····································································································· 101 7. 뷰티 FGI 회의록
··········································································································· 104 - v - 설계·개발연구방법 유형 ································································································ 6 자문위원 구성 ················································································································ 8 6가지 대표적인 차량 징후에 따른 정비방법 ·························································· 34 VR 기반 뷰티 콘텐츠의 경험 요소 검증 및 신뢰성 ··········································· 48 VR에 대한 인식, VR을 활용한 스킨케어 요소 및 과목의 발달 인식 사이의 상관관계
······················································································································· 49 간호 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항 ·············································································· 57 간호 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ·············································································· 57 간호 분야 FGI 주요 내용 ·························································································· 58 간호 분야 실감형 콘텐츠 개발 예시 ········································································ 58 치위생 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항
········································································ 60 치위생 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ········································································ 60 치위생 분야 FGI 주요 내용 ···················································································· 60 치위생 분야 실감형 콘텐츠 개발 예시 ································································ 61 건축 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항 ············································································ 62 건축 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ··········································································· 62 건축 분야 FGI 주요 내용
······················································································· 63 건축 분야 콘텐츠 우선순위 ··················································································· 64 자동차 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항 ········································································ 65 자동차 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ········································································ 65 자동차 분야 FGI 주요 내용 ···················································································· 65 자동차 분야 실감형 콘텐츠 개발 예시 ·································································· 66 전자 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항
············································································ 67 전자 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ··········································································· 67 전자 분야 FGI 주요 내용 ······················································································· 68 전자 분야 콘텐츠 우선순위 ··················································································· 68 유아교육 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항 ····································································· 70 유아교육 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ···································································· 70 메타버스 컨소시엄 참여대학의 계열별 실감(XR)
콘텐츠 개발 요구조사 표 차 례 - vi - 유아교육 분야 FGI 주요 내용 ················································································ 71 유아교육 분야 콘텐츠 우선순위 ············································································· 71 뷰티 분야 FGI 전문가 검토사항 ············································································ 72 뷰티 분야 콘텐츠 주제 검토의견 ··········································································· 72 치위생 분야 FGI 주요 내용 ···················································································· 73 뷰티 분야 콘텐츠 우선순위
····················································································· 73 전공별 콘텐츠 개발 주제 우선순위 ······································································ 78 - vii - [그림 1] 실감형 콘텐츠 개발 요구 조사 연구 FLOW ························································ 7 [그림 2] 실감형 콘텐츠 개발 요구 조사 연구 일정 ···························································· 9 [그림 3] 사례 ·························································································································· 14 [그림 4] VirtaMed 사례
······································································································· 14 [그림 5] 삼육대학교 사례 ······································································································ 15 [그림 6] 선문대학교 사례 ······································································································ 16 [그림 7] 아나토마지(Anatomage)社 사례 ·········································································· 17 [그림 8] 어그메딕스 사례 ······································································································ 17 [그림 9] 분당서울대병원 사례
······························································································ 18 [그림 10] (주)아프로스 사례 ································································································· 19 [그림 11] 증강현실을 활용한 치과방사선촬영 시뮬레이터 ················································· 20 [그림 12] 증강현실형 치과 방사선촬영 시뮬레이터 ···························································· 21 [그림 13] AR을 적용한 치아 3D 모델 실습 ····································································· 22 [그림 14] The University of Tennessee Knoxville 사례 ·········································· 23 [그림 15]
Northumbria University 사례 ········································································ 24 [그림 16] Penn State, College of Art and Architecture 사례 ································ 24 [그림 17] 일본 芝浦工業大学 사례 ······················································································· 25 [그림 18] Gammon(홍콩) 사례, 코오롱베니트(한국 사례) ·············································· 25 [그림 19] 인하대학교 사례 ··································································································· 26 [그림 20] 고려대학교 사례
··································································································· 26 [그림 21] 스웨덴 이케아 사례 ······························································································ 27 [그림 22] 미국 트림플, 어반베이스 사례 ············································································ 27 [그림 23] 미국 GE 사례(우), 영국 Balfour Beatty 사례 (좌) ······································· 28 [그림 24] 인천대학교 사례 ··································································································· 28 [그림 25] 경일대학교 사례
··································································································· 29 [그림 26] 현대건설 사례 ······································································································· 29 [그림 27] 현대자동차 메타버스 플랫폼 제페토 콘텐
