Page 75 - ebook
P. 75

B-37
                      Functional human small intestinal epithelium and their applications
                                           in human microbiome research

                      Ohman Kwon , Kwang Bo Jung 1,2 , Mooseung Lee 1,2 , Dae-Soo Kim 1,2 , and Mi-Young Son 1,2
                                  1
                                    1 Stem Cell Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)
                         2 Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science & Technology, 217 Gajung-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea

   Abstract
   Advanced technologies are required for generating human intestinal epithelial cells (hIECs) harboring cellular diversity and functionalities to predict drug absorption in humans and study
   normal intestinal epithelial physiology. We developed a reproducible two-step protocol to induce human pluripotent stem cells to differentiate into a functional hIEC monolayer exhibiting
   intestinal molecular features, cell type diversity, and high activities of intestinal transporters and metabolic enzymes such as cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Functional hIECs are more suitable
   for predicting compounds metabolized by CYP3A4 and absorbed in the intestine than Caco-2 cells. A significantly higher number of bacteria were in contact with the apical surface of the
   functional hIEC monolayers. Moreover, a higher number of macrophages attached to the basolateral side of the functional hIEC monolayer and translocated to the upper side of the Transwell
   compared to that in immature hIECs, which may be attributed to elevated receptor expression of bacterial antigens. This system is a step toward the transition from 3D intestinal organoids to
   2D hIEC monolayers without compromising cellular diversity and function. A physiologically relevant hIEC model offers a novel platform for creating patient-specific assays and support
   translational applications, thereby bridging the gap between 3D and 2D culture models of the intestine.
     Introduction & Motivation                                       Results

   Human cell-lines  Human   hPSC-deived  Human 3D intestinal   Fig 1. Human small intestinal lineage marker gene expression of hPSC-derived hIEC progenitors and functional hIECs
    (ex. Caco-2) a  primary cells b  enterocyte-like cells c  organoinds (hIOs) d
                                      (a)         (c)                                (d)



  a. Image from https://www.atcc.org/products/htb-37   (b)
  b. Image from
  https://cellbiologics.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=2_50_110&product_id=2373
  c. Iwao, T. et al. Drug. Metab. Dispos. 43(4):603-10 (2015)
  d. Jung, KB. et al. Nat. Commun. 2;9(1):3039 (2018)
   The human small intestine (hSI) is a initial and selective
    barrier for nutrient absorption, host-microbe interaction,
    andregulationofhostdefenseandimmuneresponses(1).
   The existing in vitro models do not adequately mimic the
    cellcompositionandfunctionsofhSI.   (a) MDS plots shows the pairwise distances between samples. (b) A dendrogram based on hierarchical clustering of the 85 small intestinal marker geneset from
   Recently, notable advancements have been made in the  the RNA-sequencing data using a maximum distance. (c) Relative gene expression of intestinal markers in hESC, immature hIECs, functional hIECs, Caco-2 cells,
                                        and hSI. (d) Immunofluorescence analysis of the markers of enterocyte (CDX2, VIL1), Paneth cells (LYZ), goblet cells (MUC2), and enteroendocrine cells (CHGA)
    development of hIEC models including human pluripotent  in immature and functional hIECs. Data represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 using two-tailed t test.
    stemcell(hPSC)-derivedintestinalepithelial-likecells(2-4).  Fig 2. Functional characterization of hPSC-derived hIEC progenitors and functional hIECs
   However, considerable room exists for improving the  (a)  (d)                (f)
    differentiationefficiencyandachievingsufficientexpression
    and activities of drug-metabolizing enzymes and
    transporters(5-6).
   We aimed to generate expandable and scalable hIEC
    progenitors which can differentiate into functional hIECs.
    Furthermore, the functional hIECs also derived from 3D                      (g)
    intestinal organoids to bridging the gap between 3D
    organotypicand2Dmonolayerculturesystem.
              Methods                 (b)         (c)        (e)
                                                                                (h)
  1. Differentiation of hPSC into hIEC progenitors and functional
  hIECs

                                        (a) Representative SEM images of apical surface of the immature hIECs, functional hIECs, and Caco-2 cells. (b) TEER values of immature hIECs, functional
                                        hIECs, and Caco-2 cells. (c) The Papp coefficient of FITC-dextran 4 kDa in either the apical to basolateral (A to B) or the basolateral to apical (B to A). (d) Relative
                                        gene expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in hESC, immature hIECs, functional hIECs, Caco-2 cells, and hSI. (e) Immunofluorescence
                                        analysis and activity assay of CYP3A4 in immature hIECs, functional hIECs, and Caco-2 cells. (f) Glucose-induced calcium fluctuations measured immature
                                        hIECs, functional hIECs, and Caco-2 cells. (g) The ChIP assay was performed using anti-H3K4me3 and anti-H3K27ac antibodies in immature hIEC and
                                        functional hIEC. (h) A summary of cell retention capacity of immature hIEC and functional hIEC. Data represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P
                                        < 0.001 using two-tailed t test.
                                       Fig 3. Bacterial colonization in functional hIECs  Fig 4. Macrophage infiltration in functional hIECs
   Key point 1. Easy & efficient to differentiation into hIECs
   Key point 2. Highly expandable and stably freezing & thawing
   Key point 3. Robust differentiation based on molecular mechanism
   Key point 4. Suitable expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes &
   transporters
   2. Transition from 3D hIOs to 2D functional hIECs






   Key point 1. Establishment of expandable 3D InS exp culture system
   Key point 2. Highly expandable and stably freezing & thawing  (a) Representative conforcal imaging of bactriacolonization in hPSC-derived  (a) Representative conforcal imaging of macrophage migration
   Key point 3. Robust differentiation in hIEC medium 2  immature hIECs, functional hIECs, and Caco-2. (b) Heatmap representing  across the immature hIECs or functional hIECs after liposaccharide
                                        expression of genes encoding mucins based on RNA-seq data. (c)
   Key point 4. Comparable expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes  Immunofluorescence analysis of MUC13 expression of hPSC-derived immature  (LPS) treatment for 24hrs. (b) qPCR analysis to verify the expression
                                                                             levels of LPS transporters by macrophage co-culture or LPS
         & transporters to directed differentiated functional hIECs  hIECs and functional hIECs (D) qPCR analysis of mucin and glycotransferase  stimulation in immature hIECs and functional hIECs.
                                        genes in hESC, immature hIECs, functional hIECs, Caco-2, and hSI.
             References                          Conclusion                      Acknowledgement
                                      Direct diif. & transition from 3D hIOs to generate expandable and functional hIECs  This work was supported by the Korean Fund for Regenerative
   1. Maloy, KJ. et al. Nature 474, 298-306 (2011)                         Medicine(KFRM) grant funded by the Korea government(the Ministry
   2. Jung, P. et al. Nat. Med. 17, 1225-1227 (2013)                       of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, 21A0404L1), a
   3. Ogaki, O. et al. Stem Cells 31, 1086-1096 (2013)                     grant from the Technology Innovation Program (No. 20008777)
   4. Ozawa, T. et al. Sci. Rep. 5, 16479 (2015)                           funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea),
                                                                           and a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
   5. Ogaki, O. et al. Sci. Rep. 5, 17297 (2015)                           funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-
   6. Kauffman, AL. et al. Front. Pharmacol. 4, 79 (2013)                  2018M3A9H3023077/2021M3A9H3016046).
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80