Page 13 - F. Cell biology
P. 13

RIP1 silencing sensitizes arsenite-induced necroptotic cell death
  in L929 cells

  Su Bin Sin¹ and Young Sik Cho¹*
  College of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, 1000 Sindang-dong, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 704-701, Republic of Korea
                   BACKGROUND                                                  AIM


    Arsenic compounds are one of the most environmentally hazardous substances so that those  Arsenic compounds such as sodium arsenite (SA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO)
    are classified as human carcinogens. Despite their known increased risk of cancer, arsenite  have been known to be cytotoxic. Primarily, in this study, we aimed to outline
    acts as a double-edged sword, that is, arsenic is associated with various cancers while arsenic
    trioxide (ATO) has been widely used in the treatment of relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia  the cell death modes caused by arsenic compounds and to address what
    (APL). As can be inferred from harnessing of arsenite as an anticancer drug, arsenite has been  proteins would be responsible for arsenite-induced cytotoxicity. Both SA and
    reported to cause cell death in a caspase-dependent. With caspase activation, generation of  ATO substantially exhibited cytotoxic activity in L929 cells. However,
    oxidative stress has been suggested to be essential for arsenite-mediated cytotoxicity. On the  necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) treatment significantly reversed cell death mediated by
    contrary, it is involved in triggering a caspase-independent necrotic cell death via the  arsenic compounds, suggesting that cells are committed to die in a programmed
    mitochondrial pathway.                                necrotic way. Using interfering RNAs, furthermore, we found that RIP1
                                                          knockdown rendered more sensitive to SA than mock group, and that RIP3
    Necrosis and apoptosis are exclusively distinctive in the aspects of morphology and its  knockdown had an antagonizing effect on SA cytotoxicity. SA cytotoxicity was
    underlying molecular events. Meanwhile, a specialized necrosis coined “programmed necrosis  closely correlated with intracellular ROS production. Therefore, it is proposed
    or necroptosis” has been generally regarded as an alternative cell death type that can be  that RIP1 downregulation promotes necroptotic cell death of arsenic compounds
    activated under the specific condition when tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-mediated
    apoptotic machinery is defective. Besides TNFα, it has been possibly suggested that a few  in L929.
    chemicals and heavy metals can induce necroptosis-like cell death, distinct from apoptosis.
    Similar to TNFα-mediated necroptosis, chemicals- or heavy metal-induced cell death is
    rescued by necrostatin-1 (Nec-1), a specific inhibitor receptor interacting protein 1 (RIP1).
    Once TNFα receptor (TNFR) ligated, RIP1 functions as a scaffolding protein of TNFα signaling,
    and transmits death signals to downstream effectors by forming complex with RIP3. Therefore,
    RIP1 and RIP3 are proposed to be crucial proteins that can determine cell death in favor of
    necroptosis when cells are subjected to stresses. Here, we sought to delineate the underlying
    mechanisms by which arsenite could induce cell death via non-apoptotic pathway. We found
    that ROS were responsible for SA cytotoxicity as inferred from the consequence that ROS
    scavengers could protect cells from SA exposure. Consequently, depletion of glutathione (GSH)
    rendered cells more sensitive to SA than control group. Taken together, it is suggested that
    SA-induced necroptotic cell death is mediated via ROS generation in L929 cells.
                                                RESULTS
                                                    1.2                    (A)  BSO + SA  (B)   BSO + TNF-α
        control   SA                                             6 h
                                                     1
                                                    0.8
                        Figure. 1. Effect of SA on cell death in   GSH level (fold of control)  0.6  12 h
                        L929 cells.                 0.4                    120%            120%
                        Cells were treated with SA (20 μM)                 100%        -   100%       BSO(-)
     PI  Nec-1  Nec-1 + SA  for 12, 24 and 36 h. After treatment,  0.2 0   80%        BSO  80%        BSO(+)
                        cells were stained with Annexin V
                        and PI to analyze flow cytometric  control  0.1  0.5  1  cell viability%  60%  cell viability%  60% 40%
                        data.                                BSO           40%
                                            Figure.3. Time-dependent GSH depletion in L929 cells pretreated with  20%  20%
                                            BSO.                           0%              0%
                                             L929 cells were incubated with BSO (0.1, 0.5 and 1mM) for 6 and 12 h.  control  1h  SA 3h  6h  control  3h  6h TNF-α  9h
                                            Cellular GSH levels were measured by GSH assay kit according to the
                                            protocol provided by supplier and fold difference for each group was  Figure. 4. Differential effects of BSO on SA- or TNF-mediated cytotoxicity in L929 cells.
                                                                        (A) Cells were preincubated with BSO to deplete GSH for 12 h, and then exposed to SA (20 μM) for 1, 3 and 6h. Cell
            Annexin V                       calculated by dividing GSH levels in BSO-treated group by those in control  viability was measured by MTS assay and resulting relative cell viability was expressed by percentage relative to the
     (A)            (B)                     group. .                    untreated control group. (B) GSH-depleted L929 cells plated at a density of 1x104 were stimulated with TNF-α (10ng/ml).
                                                                        Cell viability was evaluated by MTS assay as above.
      control         contr  BH     NA
                    UL  ol  UR  UL  A  UR  UL  C  UR
               P2:   10 5 2.67  1.01  10 5  2.01  1.22  10 5  1.70  0.75  (A)  Mock     siRIP1   siRIP3      (B)
                                                                                                   BSO + SA
               1.4±0  10 4  10 4  10 4              0.87     NS    0.24  0.55     Nec-1  0.78                          Mock) BSO+SA - All Events

               .2%                                  10 5   10 5            RIP1                 10 5  21.38  0.75
      SA            10 3   10 3  10 3   NS      SA  BSO  10 4  10 4                             10 4   Mock
                    10 2 0  LL  LR  10 2  LL  LR  10 2  LL  LR  Propidium Iodide-A  10 10 3 2  Propidium Iodide-A  10 10 3 2        RIP3  10 3
               P2:
    Count      95±1.  95.86 0  10 2  10 3  10 4  0.46 10 5  0  96.57 0  10 2  10 3  10 4  0.20 10 5  0  97.15 0  10 2  10 3  10 4  0.40 10 5  -  -  0 5 98.52 1.09 0  SA  - All Events  10 4  0.37 0.87 10 5  0 5 97.12 3.04 0 SA Nec-1 - All Events 10 4  1.55 1.52 10 5                     β-actin  Propidium Iodide-A  10 2


                                                            10 2
                                                     10 2
                                                              10 3
               8%
                                                       10 3
                                                             AnnexinV FITC-A

                                                      AnnexinV FITC-A
      NAC + SA     PI  10 5 UL 10.98  UR 28.70  10 5  UL 2.13  UR 1.63  10 5  UL 1.38  UR 2.43  10 10 4  10 10 4         -10 0 2  77.21  0  10 2  siRIP1)BSO+SA - All Events  10 4  10 5 0.66
                                                                                                    10 3
                                                                                                    AnnexinV FITC-A
                    10 4   10 4  10 4          +  -  10 3  10 3                                 111, 7632 10 5  38.69  3.03
               P2:                                  Propidium Iodide-A  10 2  Propidium Iodide-A  10 2  siRIP1
               15±1.  10 3  10 3  10 3  SA     PI   0  96.72  1.32  0  93.70 BSO SA Nec-1 - All Events  1.74               Figure. 6. Flow cytometric analyses of SA-mediated  10 4




               2%                                   10 5 36.90 0 BSO SA - All Events 10 4  29.25 10 5  10 5  25.13 0  10 2  10 3    10 4  26.81 10 5     cytotoxicity    in  GSH-depleted L929 cells that were  PI  10 3
                                                     10 2
                                                       10 3

      BHA + SA      10 2 LL  LR  10 2 0  LL  LR  10 2 0  LL  LR  10 4  10 4  transfected with siRIP1 and siRIP3.  Propidium Iodide-A
                    0  55.98  4.34  10 2  95.84  0.40  95.22  0.97                              10 2
               P2:   0  10 2  10 3  10 4  10 5  0  10 2  10 3  10 4  10 5  0  10 2  10 3  10 4  10 5  +  +  Propidium Iodide-A  10 3  Propidium Iodide-A  10 3     (A)    Expression levels of RIP1 and RIP3 in cells subjected to  -10 0 2  50.23  8.05
               19±5.                                10 2 0  27.57  6.28  10 0 2  42.78  5.28  RNA interference targeting RIP1 or RIP3. Silencing protocols        13.06 0  10 2  siRIP3)BSO+SA - All Events  10 4  10 5  0.50
                                                                                                    10 3
                                                                                                    AnnexinV FITC-A
               3%                                    0  BSO - All Events  10 4  10 5  0 BSO Nec1 - All Events 10 4  10 5                10 5
                            Annexin                 10 5 0.65  AnnexinV FITC-A  0.48  10 5  1.57  AnnexinV FITC-A  0.90       were carried      out as described in Materials and Methods. To  siRIP3
                                                              10 3
                                                            10 2
                                                       10 3
                                                     10 2
          DCF-DA              V                     10 4   10 4        check the outcomes of RNA interferences, L929 cell lysates  10 4 10 3
    Figure. 2. The involvement of ROS generation on SA-mediated cytotoxicity in L929 cells.   -  +  Propidium Iodide-A  10 10 3 2  Propidium Iodide-A  10 10 3 2     were   prepared to run SDS-PAGE for immunoblotting with  Propidium Iodide-A  10 2
                                                                       antibodies against RIP1 or RIP3.
                                                                                      (B) After transient
    (A) L929 cells were preincubated with NAC (5 mM) or BHA (0.1 mM) for 1 h, and then treated  0  97.88 0  10 2  10 3  10 4  0.99 10 5  -10 0 2  95.66 0  10 2  10 3  10 4  1.87 10 5  knockdown    with  siRIP1  and  siRIP3,  the  cells  were  0  86.28  0.16
    with SA (20 μM) for 24h. The cells were stained with 5 μM DCF-DA for 30min and then  AnnexinV FITC-A  AnnexinV FITC-A     preincubated with BSO (1mM) and then exposed to SA (20     0  10 2  AnnexinV FITC-A  10 4  10 5
                                                                                                    10 3
    subjected to flow cytometry analysis for intracellular ROS. Gate P2 in histogram designates  Annexin V  μM) for 6 h. The collecting cells were analyzed by the flow  Annexin V
    ROS positive cells and % cell population within P2 gate of each treated group is indicated on  Figure. 5.  Effects of  Nec-1 on  SA-driven  cytotoxicity in GSH-depleted L929   cytometry after staining with Annexin V and PI.
    the right. (B) L929 cells were preincubated with NAC (5 mM) or BHA (0.1 mM) for 1 h, and then  cells .
    exposed to SA (20 μM) for 36 h. To delineate cell death modality, cells were stained with  GSH-depleted cells were treated with SA in the presence or absence of Nec-1
    Annexin V and PI and then subjected to flow cytometry.  (10  μM)  for 9 h. Cells were analyzed by folw cytometry after staining with
                                             Annexin V and PI.
                    CONCLUSION                                          REFERENCES
     Sodium arsenite (SA) caused necroptotic-like cell death.  1. Santosh Yadav, Yongli Shi, Feng Wang, He Wang, Arsenite induces apoptosis in
                                                            human mesenchymal stem cells by altering Bcl-2 family proteins and by activating
     SA-mediated cell death were protected by Nec-1, a specific RIP1 inhibitor.  intrinsic pathway Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Volume 244, Issue 3, 1
                                                            May 2010, Pages 263-272
     Unlike TNF-α-driven necroptosis that can be protected by only BHA, SA-  2. Akao, Y., Nakagawa, Y., Akiyama, K., 1999. Arsenic trioxide induces apoptosis in
      mediated cell death was rescued by either BHA or NAC.  neuroblastoma cell lines through the activation of caspase 3 in vitro. FEBS Lett 455,
                                                            59-62.
                                                          3. Chiu, H.W., Ho, Y.S., Wang, Y.J., 2011. Arsenic trioxide induces autophagy and
     GSH-depletion rendered cells more sensitive to SA when compared to control  apoptosis in human glioma cells in vitro and in vivo through downregulation of
                                                            survivin. J Mol Med (Berl) 89, 927-941.
      group treated with SA. However, TNF-α-mediated cell death was not affected  4. Cho, Y., McQuade, T., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Chan, F.K., 2011. RIP1-dependent and
      by GSH depletion.                                     independent effects of necrostatin-1 in necrosis and T cell activation. PLoS One 6,
                                                            e23209.
     SA-mediated cell death were protected by Nec-1 in GSH-depleted cells.  5. Cho, Y.S., Challa, S., Moquin, D., Genga, R., Ray, T.D., Guildford, M., Chan, F.K.,
     RIP1 knockdown rendered more sensitive to SA than mock group in GSH-  2009. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates
      depleted cells.                                       programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell 137, 1112-1123.
     RIP3 knockdown had an antagonizing effect on SA cytotoxicity in GSH-depleted  6. Khaled Hossain, Anwarul A Akhand, Yoshiyuki Kawamoto, Jun Du, Kozue Takeda,
                                                            Jianghong Wu, Motoi Yoshihara, Hideo Tsuboi, Masashi Kato, Haruhiko Suzuki,
      cells.                                                Izumi Nakashima, Caspase activation is accelerated by the inhibition of arsenite-
                                                            induced, membrane rafts-dependent Akt activation,Free Radical Biology and
                                                            Medicine, Volume 34, Issue 5, 1 March 2003, Pages 598-606
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18