Page 25 - D. Cancer biology
P. 25

Broad anti-cancer effect of a specific thioredoxin

                                          reductase 1 inhibitor


                                        Eunkyu Sung, Jiyoung Lee and Sang Won Kang
                               Department of Life Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 120-750, Korea.
         Introduction
         Reactive oxygen species (ROS) include the superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals. All living things produce ROS, primarily through leakage of electrons
         in mitochondrial respiration. The thioredoxin (Trx) and Trx reductase (TrxR) systems are key antioxidant systems for maintaining reactive oxygen species (ROS) balance.
         High ROS levels are produced because of abnormal proliferation and survival signaling. The expression of Trx/TrxR enzymes increases to eliminate ROS. To date, several
         small-molecule inhibitors that target the Trx/TrxR system have been used to treat cancer cells. In this system, mammalian TrxR exists as cytosolic TrxR1 and mitochondria
         TrxR2, but most of the compounds known so far cannot distinguish TrxR1 and TrxR2. However, targeting TrxR2 affects the mitochondria function, which, as a result, comes
         to affect normal cells too. In this study, we characterize a new compound (225-C8) that specifically inhibits cytosolic TrxR1, and examine how it affects cancer cells and
         normal cells.
                    Study aims
          ‹ To examine whether 225-C8 detected via screening is an  Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of 225-C8 and auranofin treated  A  Huh7  B
           inhibitor of TrxR.               cancer cell lines                     120       siControl  ٞ  120  siControl
                                                                                                            24h siTrxR1
          ‹ To  examine  whether  225-C8  distinguishes  between  (A) TXNRD1 (TrxR1) and TXNRD2 (TrxR2) expression correlated with  100  siTrxR1  100  72h
           cytosolic TrxR1 and mitochondrial TrxR2.  patient survival. Kaplan–Meier RNA-seq curves showing survival in the  80  80  *
                                            cases of high and low expression of TXNRD1 and TXNRD2 in liver and
          ‹ To find the mechanism by which it affects mammalian  lung cancer patients. (B-D) Cytotoxicity of 225-C8 in (B) liver cancer  TrxR1 mRNA level  (% of control)  60  Cellular TrxR activity  (% of control)  60
           cancer cells and normal cells.   cell lines HepG2, Huh7, and Hep3B; (C) colon cancer cell lines RKO  40  40
                                            and HCT116; and (D) lung cancer cell lines A549 and H460. (E-G)  20  20  *
                            225-C8          Cytotoxicity of auranofin in (E) liver cancer cell lines HepG2, Huh7, and  0  0  Huh7
                                 ?          Hep3B; (F) colon cancer cell lines RKO and HCT116; and (G) lung  Huh7
                                            cancer cell lines A549 and H460.    C    siControl        siTrxR1  D  Huh7
                                                                                                   0.6
                                                                                  Huh7                siControl
                                                                                                      siTrxR1
                                                          C                                        0.5
                                            A              x10 6  MS: 0.0060-0.2593/ Sample3 / ESI+/ 230080 10 5 2000ESI+0.1%FA ACN /  (908685)  0.4  *
                                                  225-C8    1.00   447.1477       120    *        A 450
                                                            0.90
                                                            0.80                             siControl  0.3
                                            2500.000        0.70                             siTrxR1
                                                   8.852                          100
                                            2000.000        Inensity  0.60                         0.2
                                                            0.50
                     Methods                Voltage (mV)  1500.000  0.40  213.0516  Colony number  (% of control)  80 60  0.1  1  2  3  4  5
                                                            0.30
                                                            0.20
                                                            0.00
          ‹ Recombinant and cellular thioredoxin reductase activity  1000.000  0.10  50  100  150  200  250  300  350  400  450  500  550  600  650  700  750  800  850  900 893.3279 950  1000  40  Day
                                             500.000
           assay using DTNB                  0.000        D x10 4  MS: 0.8328-1.1262/ Sample1 / ESI+/ 230080 10 5 2000ESI+0.1%FA ACN /  m/z  (11754)  20
          ‹ Cell viability assay               0.000  1.053  2.107  3.160  4.213  5.267  6.320  7.373  8.427  9.480  10.533  11.587  12.640  13.693  14.747  15.800  16.853  17.907  18.960  1.20  447.1465  0  Huh7
                                                            1.10
                                                  Time (min)  1.00
          ‹ Cell colony formation and proliferation assay   0.90    492.9507
                                                            0.80
                                                            0.70
          ‹ High-performance liquid chromatography  B  Huh7  Inensity  0.60  376.2007  Figure 5. Decreased colony formation and proliferation in
                                                            0.50
                                            2500.000        0.40    454.2288  663.3799  TrxR1-knockdown cell
                                                            0.30
                                                            0.20  221.0415  284.2783  628.3062  726.3837
                      Results               2000.000        0.10  50  100  150  200  250  300  350  400  450  500  550  600  650  700  750  800 810.4850 850  875.4270 900  950 1000 992.3649  (A) Huh7 cells were transfected with siTrxR1 for 24 h. mRNA levels were
                                                            0.00
                                            1500.000
                                                                               observed by real-time PCR. (B) Cellular TrxR activity in TrxR1 knockdown
         A                  B               Voltage (mV)  1000.000  7.238  E x10 4  MS: 1.1916-1.3183/ Sample2 / ESI+/ 230080 10 5 2000ESI+0.1%FA ACN /  m/z  (17841)  cells. Huh7 was transfected for 24 h and 72 h, and cellular TrxR activity
           O  R 1             1.4     Control  500.000      1.75               was determined using a modified insulin endpoint assay. (C) TrxR1-
                                      225-C8                1.50   447.1701    knockdown Huh7 cells were incubated for 10 days. Cells were then fixed
            N              P  1.2     001-E4  0.000
                          Au          Auranofin             1.25               with formaldehyde and stained with crystal violet. Plates were imaged,
                  HN  O  O    1.0              0.000  1.053  2.107  3.160  4.213  5.267  6.320  7.373  8.427  9.480  10.533  11.587  12.640  13.693  14.747  15.800  16.853  17.907  18.960  1.00
                   N  NH  S                                 Inensity
               N  N  N  O  O                                0.75  353.2242     and colonies were counted with Image J software. (D) TrxR1-knockdown
            N  R 2  N  O  O  A340  0.8            Time (min)     288.2503
                  S  NH                                     0.50       726.4125  Huh7 cells were incubated for five days. Every 24 h, cell viability was
         F  N        O  O  O  O  0.6                        0.25  316.2800  430.8691  507.2256  591.4482  663.4059  measured. Results are shown as the average of three experiments
                                                                244.2262  763.1283  838.7859  949.7568
                              0.4                           0.00               performed in triplicate, and the significance was evaluated by a Student’s
         225-C8  001-E4  Auranofin  0.2                       50  100  150  200  250  300  350  400  450  m/z 500  550  600  650  700  750  800  850  900  950  1000  t-test (*P <0.01).
                               0  100 200 300 400 500 600
                                   Time (s)
         C                D                 Figure 3. Analysis of 225-C8 by liquid chromatography
                TrxR1            TrxR1      and mass spectrometry
           140         Auranofin  120  Auranofin  (A) 225-C8 analyzed by HPLC using a C18 column and detection at  A  160  225-C8  B  160  Auranofin
          DTNB reduction  (% of control)  100 80 60 40  001-E4  DTNB reduction  (% of control)  80 60 40  extracted with methanol. The extract analyzed by HPLC using a C18  120  CCD841CoN  120  CCD841CoN
           120
                       225-C8
                                      225-C8
                                            240 nm. (B) Huh7 cells treated with 225-C8 for 1 h, and lysates
                            100
                                                                                                             MCF10A
                                                                                           MCF10A
                                                                                                             AML12
                                                                                           AML12
                                            column and detection at 240 nm. (C) 225-C8 mass spectrometry
                                            analysis. (D) The peak fractions at 8.8 min and (E) 7.2 min of HPLC
            0 20            20              analyzed by mass spectrometry.      Cell viability (% of control)  80  Cell viability (% of control)  80
             10 -9  10 -8  10 -7  10 -6  10 -5  0                                40                40
                             10 -10  10 -9  10 -8  10 -7  10 -6
              log [compound](M)  log [compound](M)
                TrxR2
         E                F      GR         A  Liver cancer  B  Colon cancer  C  Lung cancer  Control  225-C8(uM): 0  0.05 0.1   1    5    10   20   50  100 Auranofin(uM): 0  0.05 0.1   1    5    10   20  50  100
                                                                                                   0
                                                                                 0
           100 80    Auranofin  120 100  Auranofin  ٞ  120 100  225-C8  Control  ٞ  120 100  225-C8  Control  ٞ  120 100  N.S  N.S 225-C8  Cell Lysate  C
                     225-C8
                                                    Cell
                                                                Cell
          DTNB reduction  (% of control)  60 40  % of control  80 60  Cellular TrxR activity  (% of control)  80 60  *  Cellular TrxR activity  (% of control)  80 60  *  *  Cellular TrxR activity  (% of control)  80 60  2.5  Control  AML12
                                                    Lysate
                                       225-C8
                                                                Lysate
                                                                                    225-C8
                                                                                 2.0
            20
                            20 40            40 20  *  *  40 20  *  *  40 20  *  *  A 450  1.5
            0               0                0  *  *  *  0         0
            10 -10  10 -9  10 -8  10 -7  10 -6  10 -8  10 -7  10 -6  HepG2           Huh7            Hep3B  RKO                      HCT116  A549                         H460  1.0
               log [compound](M)  log [compound](M)  D
                                             225-C8:   DMSO      0.5uM       1uM         2uM          3uM        4uM  Liver cancer  0.5
         Figure 1. Inhibitory activity of Prx inhibitor candidate  120     HepG2  1  2  3  4  5
         against thioredoxin reductase       HepG2                 100     Huh7        Day
                                                                           Hep3B
         (A) Chemical structures of 225-C8, 001-E4, and auranofin. (B) 225-C8,  80  Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of 225-C8 and auranofin in normal
         001-E4, and auranofin incubated with yeast TrxR, respectively. (C) 225-C8,  Huh7  Colony number  (% of control)  60  cell lines
         001-E4, and auranofin inhibition of rat TrxR1 enzymatic reduction of DTNB.  40  (A) Cytotoxicity of 225-C8 and (B) auranofin was measured in
         (D) 225-C8 and auranofin inhibition of rat TrxR1 enzymatic reduction of  20  CCD841CoN, MCF10A, and AML12 cell lines. All cells were treated with
                                                                    0
         DTNB. (E) 225-C8 and auranofin inhibition of human TrxR2 enzymatic  Hep3B  225-C8(uM) : DMSO 0.5     1       2      3       4  increasing concentrations of 225-C8 for 24 h. (C) AML12 cells were
         reduction of DTNB. (F) 225-C8 and auranofin inhibition of human GR    incubated with 225-C8 for five days. Every 24 h, cell viability was
         enzymatic activity.                                           Colon cancer
                                            E                      120         measured.
                                             225-C8:  DMSO    0.5uM       1uM         2uM        3uM        4uM  100  RKO
                                                                           HCT116
                                                                  Colony number  40
          A        Liver cancer  Lung cancer  RKO                  (% of control)  80 60
                                             HCT116                 20              Discussion & Conclusion
                                                                    0
          TXNRD1                                                 225-C8(uM) : DMSO  0.5       1         2         3        4  The results of this study showed that 225-C8 inhibits yeast
                                                                               TrxR and mammalin TrxR, and specifically inhibits cytosolic
                                               F             G
                                                     Huh7           Hep3B      TrxR1. In addition, it was confirmed that 225-C8 reduced
                                               1.6  Control   0.7  Control     cancer cells viability, colony formation and proliferation. Similar
                  Liver cancer  Lung cancer    1.4  225-C8    0.6  225-C8      to cancer cells, in normal cells, 225-C8 decreased the viability,
                                               1.2          *  0.5
                                               A 450  1.0     A 450  0.4       however, there was no difference in cell proliferation treated by
                                               0.8
                                                              0.3              225-C8. These results demonstrate that 225-C8 is a
                                               0.6
          TXNRD2                               0.4            0.2              compound that specifically inhibits cytosolic TrxR1, and it can
                                               0.2            0.1              be used to specifically suppress cancer cell growth.
                                                 1  2  3  4  5  1  2  3  4  5
                                                     Day            Day
                                            Figure 4. Sufficient inhibition of the colony formation
         B    Liver cancer  C  Colon cancer  D  Lung cancer  and proliferation of cancer cell lines by 225-C8 treatment
           120    HepG2  120  RKO  140   A549  Inhibition of cellular TrxR activity by 225-C8 in (A) liver cancer cell lines  Reference
                             HCT116
           100    Huh7  100 80    120    H460  HepG2, Huh7, and Hep3B; (B) colon cancer cell lines RKO and
                  Hep3B
          Cell viability  (% of control)  80 60 40  Cell viability  (% of control)  60 40  Cell viability  (% of control)  80 60 40  HCT116; and (C) lung cancer cell lines A549 and H460. (D) Liver  [1] Stafford, W.C., et al., Irreversible inhibition of cytosolic thioredoxin reductase 1 as a
                                  100
                                                                               mechanistic basis for anticancer therapy. Sci Transl Med, 2018. 10(428).
                                            cancer cell lines HepG2, Huh7, and Hep3B (1˘10 ଷ cells/well) and (E)
            0 20      20 0        20 0      lung cancer cell lines RKO and HCT116 (1 ˘ 10 ଷ cells/well) were  [2] Karlenius, T.C. and K.F. Tonissen, Thioredoxin and Cancer: A Role for Thioredoxin
          225-C8(uM): 0  0.05  0.1   1     5   10   20  50   100  225-C8(uM): 0  0.05  0.1  1     5    10   20   50  100  225-C8(uM): 0  0.05  0.1  1     5    10   20   50  100  treated with increasing concentrations of 225-C8. After 10 to 14 days of  in all States of Tumor Oxygenation. Cancers (Basel), 2010. 2(2): p. 209-32.
                                            continuous treatment, the cells were fixed with formaldehyde and
         E  120  Liver cancer  HepG2  F  100  Colon cancer  RKO  G  100  Lung cancer  A549  stained with crystal violet. The plates were imaged, and colonies were  [3]Zhang, J.,etal., Targeting the Thioredoxin System for Cancer Therapy. Trends
                                            counted with Image J software. (F) Proliferation assays were
                  Huh7
                                        H460
                             HCT116
                                                                               Pharmacol Sci, 2017. 38(9): p. 794-808.
           100
          Cell viability  (% of control)  80 60  Hep3B  Cell viability  (% of control)  80 60 40  Cell viability  (% of control)  80 60 40  conducted on Huh7 and (G) Hep3B cells. 225-C8 was added to each  [4] McLoughlin, M.R., et al., TrxR1, Gsr, and oxidative stress determine hepatocellular
                                            well, and cell viability was measured after 1 to 5 days. Results are
                                            shown as the average of three experiments performed in triplicate, and
           20 40       20         20        the significance was evaluated by a Student’s t-test (*P <0.01).  carcinoma malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019. 116(23): p. 11408-11417.
            0          0          0
         Auranofin(uM): 0  0.05 0.1   1     5    10   20   50  100  Auranofin(uM):  0      1       2      5      10     50  Auranofin(uM):  0      1       2      5      10     50
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30